Examination of Isomer Specific Bioaccumulation Parameters and Potential In vivo Hepatic Metabolites of <i>syn-</i> and <i>anti</i>-Dechlorane Plus Isomers in Juvenile Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were exposed in the laboratory to elevated doses of syn- and anti-isomers of Dechlorane Plus (DP) via their diet for 49 days (uptake phase), followed by 112 days of untreated food (depuration phase) to examine bioaccumulation parameters and possible metabolic products. Three groups of 60 fish were used in the study. Two groups were exposed separately to food fortified with known concentrations of syn- (0.79 +/- 0.03 microg/g, lipid weight) and anti-DP (1.17 +/- 0.12 microg/g, lipid weight) while a third control group was fed unfortified food. Neither isomer reached steady-state after 49 days of exposure. Only the syn-isomer accumulated linearly in the fish (whole-body minus liver) during the dosing phase with a calculated uptake rate constant of 0.045 +/- 0.005 (arithmetic mean +/- 1 x standard error) nmoles per day. A similar uptake rate was also observed for this isomer in the liver. The elimination of both isomers from the whole fish (minus liver) obeyed first order depuration kinetics (syn-: r2 = 0.6427, p < 0.001, anti-: r2 = 0.5350, p < 0.005) with calculated half-lives (t1/2) of 53.3 +/- 13.1 (syn-) and 30.4 +/- 5.7 (anti-) days. Elimination of the isomers from the liver was difficult to interpret because of suspected enterohepatic circulation and redistribution of the isomers in the liver during clearance from other tissues. The biomagnification factor (BMF, determined in whole fish minus liver) of the syn-isomer (5.2) was greater than the anti-isomer (1.9) suggesting that the former isomer is more bioavailable. A suite of metabolites were screened for in the liver including dechlorinated, hydroxylated, methoxylated and methyl sulfone degradates. Even with the purposely high dose used in the uptake phase, none of these degradates could be detected in the extracts. This suggests that if metabolites of DP are detected in fish from aquatic food webs their presence is likely not from in vivo biotransformation of the parent compound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".