La gouvernance multiniveau dans les nations minoritaires : les cas du Quebec-Canada et de la Catalogne-Espagne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, nous examinons la gouvernance multiniveau de deuxnations minoritaires (le Québec et la Catalogne) dans troischamps de politique, soit la langue, l’immigration et lesrelations internationales. Après l’examen de ces troischamps, il ressort qu’une telle gouvernance est absente de lapolitique linguistique au Québec-Canada, alors qu’elleatteint un paroxysme de formalisme pour ce qui est de la politiqued’immigration. Quant aux relations internationales, lagouvernance varie selon les dossiers. Du côté de laCatalogne-Espagne, la gouvernance multiniveau est appeléeà changer au chapitre de la politique linguistique, et elle estprésente en regard de la politique d’immigration,quoiqu’elle connaisse certaines difficultés en raison dela gestion budgétaire et de l’implication des éluspolitiques. Finalement, la politique de relations extérieuresest soumise à la volonté de Madrid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".