MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090460831 · doi:10.1002/cnm.848

Variational boundary element acoustic modelling over mixed quadrilateral-triangular element meshes

2006· article· en· W2090460831 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrilateralSingularityBoundary element methodPolygon meshBoundary (topology)MathematicsElement (criminal law)Mathematical analysisSquare (algebra)Finite element methodGeometryTransformation (genetics)Applied mathematicsStructural engineeringEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The variational indirect boundary element method is widely used in many acoustical problems such as simulation of scattering and radiation phenomena. Although it has many advantageous features in dealing with those problems, it suffers from the singularity problem when the double surface integral is done over the same element. In this paper, a straightforward technique for computing the singularity 1/R over triangular element is presented. It is based on a generalized polar co-ordinates transformation to transform the triangular master element into a square one. The singularity factor is taken as weight function. Consequently, a single straightforward implementation without any special treatment of singularity is possible for meshes involving both quadrilateral and triangular elements of higher order. The efficiency of the proposed method is demonstrated for some numerical examples. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it