MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090487913 · doi:10.1021/je0340250

Surface Thermodynamics of Aqueous Solutions of Morpholine and Methylmorpholine

2004· article· en· W2090487913 on OpenAlex
Yadollah Maham, Anne Chevillard, Alan E. Mather

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicThermodynamic properties of mixtures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorpholineChemistrySurface tensionAqueous solutionEnthalpyThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surface tension of aqueous solutions of morpholine and methylmorpholine has been measured at temperatures from (298.15 to 328.15) K, covering the whole range of concentration. The surface tension of the solutions decreases with increasing morpholine concentrations at the water-rich side, and it remains practically constant for the rest of solutions. The surface enthalpy and surface entropy have been obtained from the temperature variation of the surface tension at constant mole fraction. The surface entropy of these aqueous solutions shows a nonrandom behavior at very low concentrations of morpholine and of methylmorpholine. There are two maxima (at x 2 = 0.025 and x 2 = 0.085) in the surface entropy of morpholine (2) + water (1) mixtures; methylmorpholine (3) + water (1) mixtures show one (at x 3 = 0.048). The surface enthalpies are similar to the surface entropies. The binding constants of morpholine and methylmorpholine on the water surface were calculated, and in both cases, the binding constants are temperature dependent. For morpholine, it increases with temperature; for methylmorpholine, it decreases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it