Fungal and nematode threats to Australian forests and amenity trees from importation of wood and wood products <sup>1</sup>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A combination of geographical isolation and effective quarantine practices has excluded many serious pathogens of trees from Australia. The international trade in untreated wood and wood products, including dunnage, has increased the likelihood of the introduction of exotic pathogens and decay fungi and their becoming established and deleteriously affecting the current relatively healthy status of Australia's native and plantation forests, and amenity trees. Forest pathogens such as Heterobasidion annosum, Fusarium circinatum, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, Puccinia psidii, and Phellinus pini are considered serious threats to plantation forests in Australia. The potential impact, if the more serious exotic pathogens of forests were to be introduced, would not only be the loss of a few seasons' crops, but also the loss of decades of effort and investment in plantations, as well as irreparable damage to the native biota and wood resources. Effective quarantine policies and procedures are necessary to prevent the entry of these pathogens into Australia.Key words: quarantine, wood, fungal pathogens, nematodes, risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it