MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090509343 · doi:10.1109/lascas.2014.6820259

Adjusted empirical mode decomposition with improved performance for signal modeling and prediction

2014· article· en· W2090509343 on OpenAlexaff
Salim Lahmiri, Mounir Boukadoum

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformBackpropagationSIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkMode (computer interface)Artificial intelligenceDecompositionTime seriesPattern recognition (psychology)Probability density functionAlgorithmSeries (stratigraphy)Signal processingMachine learningMathematicsStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An adjusted empirical mode decomposition method, built on Student's probability density function is presented. Compared to the original EMD, the new version provides a lower number of intrinsic mode functions and is more accurate in signal modeling and prediction. Using a backpropagation neural network for learning and in-sample prediction, our experimental results on a synthetic signal, an electrocardiogram (ECG), and a financial time series show that the presented tEMD is more efficient and leads to higher prediction accuracy than conventional EMD, regardless of the input time signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207