Zero-One Programming Model for Daily Operation Scheduling of Irrigation Canal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irrigation scheduling is one of the important managerial activities that aim at effective and efficient utilization of water.A number of scheduling techniques are available today. Despite this, irrigation scheduling is only at inception level inmost of developing countries. In India also there are many methods of irrigation scheduling to canals are available. Thedrawback of this method of operation of laterals is highlighted in this paper. Further, operations of the laterals are to besimple so that the system can be managed easily. In addition, the supply to laterals should match with the day supply inthe canal and total supply for the period. In this paper a Mixed Linear Integer Programming model is described, whichaims at daily scheduling of laterals from the canal considering the constraints of the system. It is proposed to run thelaterals, (except a lateral which is proposed to operate at variable discharge) either full/half or closed condition formaking the laterals operation simple. This Zero-One Mixed Linear Integer Programming model is applied to a fieldproblem to derive daily operation scheduling of laterals of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it