Eculizumab Therapy in Children with Severe Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation–Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We recently observed that dysregulation of the complement system may be involved in the pathogenesis of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (HSCT-TMA). These findings suggest that the complement inhibitor eculizumab could be a therapeutic option for this severe HSCT complication with high mortality. However, the efficacy of eculizumab in children with HSCT-TMA and its dosing requirements are not known. We treated 6 children with severe HSCT-TMA using eculizumab and adjusted the dose to achieve a therapeutic level >99 μg/mL. HSCT-TMA resolved over time in 4 of 6 children after achieving therapeutic eculizumab levels and complete complement blockade, as measured by low total hemolytic complement activity (CH50). To achieve therapeutic drug levels and a clinical response, children with HSCT-TMA required higher doses or more frequent eculizumab infusions than currently recommended for children with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Two critically ill patients failed to reach therapeutic eculizumab levels, even after dose escalation, and subsequently died. Our data indicate that eculizumab may be a therapeutic option for HSCT-TMA, but HSCT patients appear to require higher medication dosing than recommended for other conditions. We also observed that a CH50 level ≤ 4 complement activity enzyme units correlated with therapeutic eculizumab levels and clinical response, and therefore CH50 may be useful to guide eculizumab dosing in HSCT patients as drug level monitoring is not readily available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it