MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090541035

FAR-INFRARED SYNCHROTRON-BASED SPECTROSCOPY OF FURAN: ANALYSIS OF THE $\nu_{14}-\nu_{11}$ PERTURBATION AND THE $\nu_{18}$ AND $\nu_{19}$ LEVELS

2011· article· en· W2090541035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. W. Tokaryk, Scott D. Culligan, Brant Billinghurst, J. A. Van Wijngaarden

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchrotronSpectroscopyLibrary sciencePhysicsEngineering physicsNuclear physicsAstronomyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Author Institution: Department of Physics and Centre for Laser, Atomic and Molecular Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 5A3; Canadian Light Source, Inc., 101 Perimeter Road, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0X4; Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Same topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207