MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

URANIUM AND URANIUM DECAY SERIES RADIONUCLIDE DYNAMICS IN BONE OF RATS FOLLOWING CHRONIC URANIUM ORE DUST INHALATION

2001· article· en· W2090620236 on OpenAlexaff
Trevor Dewit, Victor Clulow, John S. Jackson, R. E. J. Mitchel

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInhalationRadionuclideUraniumChemistryRadiochemistryNatural uraniumIsotopes of uraniumEnvironmental chemistryMedicineAnatomyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accumulation and release of uranium and some uranium decay chain radionuclides were measured in the bones of rats that had been chronically exposed to inhaled uranium ore dust during the first half (approximately) of their natural adult lifespan. Endochondral bone (femur, tibia, humerus, radius, and ulna), membrane bone (skull roofing bones) and muscle of Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 55) that died at various times up to 65 weeks after the end of chronic inhalation of uranium ore dust aerosol (4.2 h d(-1) for 65 wk) and from age matched controls (n = 10), were analyzed for uranium, 230Th, 226Ra, 210Pb, and 210Po. Overall, during the period of dust inhalation, the nuclides accumulated in the above order of decreasing concentration in dry bone. However, the results demonstrate that there was some differential accumulation of uranium and uranium decay series radionuclides in muscle and two bone types of rats during the chronic inhalation period. The data also show that the bone levels of some, but not all, radionuclides decreased significantly with time after inhalation ceased. Lung uranium concentration at the time of death was a highly significant covariant for temporal changes in the levels of some radionuclides in both endochondral bone and membrane bone, indicating that lung remained a major source of these isotopes for accumulation in these bone types after ore dust inhalation had ceased. For some isotopes, the two bone types behaved differently during the dust inhalation period, and differently again after the dust inhalation ceased. The relative behavior of one bone type compared to the other for a particular isotope during the dust inhalation period did not predict the relative behavior after dust inhalation ceased. However, a faster accumulation of one bone type compared to the other for a particular isotope during the dust inhalation period predicted a faster decrease after dust inhalation ended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth PhysicsSame topicRadioactivity and Radon MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207