MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090639626 · doi:10.1080/00207160701779541

On the definition of stochastic λ-transducers

2008· article· en· W2090639626 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Mathematics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransducerAutomatonProbabilistic logicComputer scienceProbabilistic automatonStochastic processAlgorithmMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceAcousticsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a formal definition for the general notion of stochastic transducer, called stochastic λ-transducer. Our definition is designed with two objectives in mind: (i) to extend naturally the established notion of stochastic automaton with output—as defined in the classic books of [A. Paz, Introduction to Probabilistic Automata, Academic Press, New York and London, 1971; P. Starke, Abstract Automata, North-Holland, Academic Press, 1972.]—by permitting pairs of input-output words of different lengths; (ii) to be compatible with the more general notion of weighted transducer so that one can apply tools of weighted transducers to address certain computational problems involving stochastic transducers. The new transducers can be used to model stochastic input-output processes that cannot be modelled using classical stochastic automata with output.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it