Chalcogeno-urea Ligands on a Phosphadiazonium Lewis Acceptor: A New Synthetic Approach to Ch−P Bonds (Ch = O, S, Se)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The isolation and characterization of the first intermolecular chalcogeno-urea complexes of iminophosphines are described. Trifluoromethylsulfonyloxy(2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenylimino)phosphine, MesNPOTf, reacts quantitatively with chalcogenoimidazolines (ChIm, Ch = O, S, Se) and 1,3-dimethyldiphenylurea (OU) to give Lewis acid-base complexes, [MesNP.ChIm]OTf and [MesNP.OU]OTf. Single crystal X-ray diffraction studies indicate that the closest contact of the chalcogeno-urea donor occurs at phosphorus in all cases, representing compounds that contain examples of O-P, S-P, and Se-P coordinate bonds. In all complexes, coordination of the ligand causes significant displacement of the OTf anion, and the resulting cations [MesNP.L](+) are best described as complexes of a neutral ligand on a phosphadiazonium Lewis acceptor. As such, the complex ions [MesNP.L](+) are novel examples of cationic systems containing dicoordinate phosphorus centers. The complexes highlight the potential for electron-rich centers to behave as Lewis acids despite the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the acceptor site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".