MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090681531 · doi:10.2118/141267-ms

Simulation of Flow in Discrete Deformable Fractured Porous Media

2011· article· en· W2090681531 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge E. Monteagudo, A. Rodríguez, Horacio Flórez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsPoromechanicsGeomechanicsMechanicsPorous mediumDiscontinuity (linguistics)DiscretizationDeformation (meteorology)Fracture (geology)GeologyFlow (mathematics)Finite element methodFluid dynamicsGeotechnical engineeringBoundary value problemCapillary pressureHydraulic fracturingMaterials sciencePorosityMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringStructural engineeringMathematical analysisComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigate the coupled flow/geomechanics behavior of naturally fractured permeable rocks. Model and simulation of these processes is very challenging due to the multi-scale nature of the problems and the strong coupling that exists between flow and mechanical behaviors. We present a numerical procedure for the simulation of two-phase immiscible and compressible flow coupled to mechanical deformation in two-dimensional discrete-fractured porous media. To achive this coupling, we implemented an iterative procedure between the flow and the mechanical deformation simulations in which the fluid pressure in the fracture is used as boundary condition at fracture walls. The deformation problem is solved by discretizing the poroelastic equilibrium equations following a Galerkin Finite Element approach, while the flow part was solved using the discrete fracture control volume method. For the flow simulation fractures are assumed to be n-1 dimensional elements where n is the dimension of the overall problem. We considered continuity in capillary pressure and the implied discontinuity in saturation. The model introduces a coupling between mechanical behavior and flow properties by relating absolute permeabilities to the fracture deformation. This approach allows us to study the effects of the coupling on the oil recovery in stress sensitive fractured porous media. We present results for the simulation of synthetic cases to illustrate some of the geomechanical effects that may arise during oil recovery in fractured reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207