MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090688602 · doi:10.5430/bmr.v2n2p61

The Countermeasures of Improving the Willingness to Pay for the Pay Channel

2013· article· en· W2090688602 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fanbin Zeng, Xuejuan Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueBusiness and Management Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Platforms and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsChinaChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsCable televisionBusinessAdvertisingWillingness to payAdministration (probate law)Digital televisionDigital cableState (computer science)Computer scienceEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Along with common use of the digital technology, the development of digital television industry has become the trend of the world. In July 2003, the State Administration of Radio came up with the conversion concept of digital television and approved 33 cities as the first batch of cable digital TV pilot. Since then, the number of cable television subscribers in China has been growing at a high speed, according to the data of the State Administration of Radio and Television. Until the end of January of 2011, China’s digital cable TV users has exceeded 90,000,000, reaching 90,392,000. The degree of wired digitalization reached 48.26%. (The basic users of cable TV were 187,300,000. China digital cable TV users increase steadily, and the level of cable digitalization rises steadily. However, the development of the digital pay channel of China is not so satisfactory. We should pay attention to some problems, for example, the purchase intention of pay channel is not so high in China. Here we are going to summarize the reason that the purchase intention of pay channel is not so high. Besides, we are going to try to find out the countermeasures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBusiness and Management ResearchSame topicDigital Platforms and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207