Role of Substitution on the Photophysical Properties of 5,5′-Diaryl-2,2′-bipyridine (bpy*) in [Ir(ppy)<sub>2</sub>(bpy*)]PF<sub>6</sub>Complexes: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis of a family of 4'-functionalized 5,5'-diaryl-2,2'-bipyridines (bpy*; 6a-6g) is reported. These ligands were reacted with the dimer [(ppy)(2)IrCl](2) (ppyH = 2-phenylpyridine) and afforded, after subsequent counterion exchange, a new series of luminescent cationic heteroleptic iridium(III) complexes, [(ppy)(2)Ir(bpy*)]PF(6) (8a-8g). These complexes were characterized by electrochemical and spectroscopic methods. The crystal structures of two of these complexes (8a and 8g) are reported. All of the complexes except for 8c and 8f exhibit intense and long-lived emission in both 2-MeTHF and ACN at 77 K and room temperature. The origin of this emission has been assigned by computational modeling to be an admixture of ligand-to-ligand charge-transfer [(3)LLCT; pi(ppy) --> pi*(bpy*)] and metal-to-ligand charge-transfer [(3)MLCT; dpi(Ir) --> pi*(bpy*)] excited states that are primarily composed of the former. The luminescent properties for 8a-8c are dependent upon the functionalization at the 4' position of the aryl substituents affixed to the diimine ligand, while those for 8d-8g are essentially independent because of an electronic decoupling of the aryls and bpy due to the substitution of o,o-dimethyl groups on the aryls, causing a near 90 degrees angle between the aryl and bipyridyl moieties. A combined density functional theory (DFT)/time-dependent DFT study was conducted in order to understand the origin of the transitions in the absorption and emission spectra and to predict accurately emission energies for these complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".