Quaternized and Unmodified Chitosans: Hydrodynamic Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular properties of N-[(2-hydroxy-3-trimethylammonium)propyl]chitosan (modified chitosan) series with the averaged quaternization degree 90% have been studied in comparison with the unmodified chitosan series by the method of translation isothermal diffusion, viscometry and static light scattering in dilute solutions in 0.33М СН3СООН+0.2М CH3СООNa at pH 3.54. Molecular mass, translation diffusion coefficient, and hydrodynamic size of the homologues samples in the modified/unnmodified series have been determined as well as their chain rigidity and Mark-Kuhn-Houwink equations at acidic pH. It was established that the size of modified chitosan molecules might be smaller than the initial polysaccharide of an equal polymerization degree in the same solvent, which was explained by the change of thermodynamic conditions and the change of the ratio of thermodynamic/electrostatic contributions to the total chain rigidity. Quaternized chitosan molecules displayed the different hydrodynamic behavior in 0.33М СН3СООН+0.2М CH3СООNa and in 0.2M NaCl (neutral pH). Solution properties of quaternized chitosan at neutral pH had been identified as the concentration dependent. The threshold influence of the secondary amino group protonation on the hydrodynamic properties of modified chitosan molecules was detected in 0.2M NaCl at the solute concentration range 0.001-0.004 g/cm3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".