MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090711327 · doi:10.1177/107780040100700606

The “Unfinished Story”: Narratively Analyzing Collective Action Frames in Social Movements

2001· article· en· W2090711327 on OpenAlexaff
Robert VanWynsberghe

Bibliographic record

VenueQualitative Inquiry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeReflexivitySociologyAction (physics)Field (mathematics)Collective actionIdentity (music)EpistemologySocial movementCollective identityNarrative inquiryAutoethnographySocial identity theoryAestheticsSocial scienceLiteratureSocial groupPolitical sciencePoliticsArtPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the author proposes the “unfinished story” as an interesting and useful narrative-based method for understanding the processes of constructing collective action frames in social movements based on his research in the Walpole Island First Nation. Amedium that works within a narrative structure, the “unfinished story” provides insight into how interpretive devices embody a radically self-reflexive identity the author calls the Ecological Native. He discusses the steps involved and some influential experiences in the field. More radical next steps are discussed in the concluding section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.246
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQualitative InquirySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207