MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090769263 · doi:10.1086/505144

Morphological Analysis of H<scp>i</scp>Features. II. Wavelet‐based Multifractal Formalism

2006· article· en· W2090769263 on OpenAlexaff
Antoine Khalil, G. Joncas, Fahima Nekka, Pierre Kestener, A. Arnéodo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSpiral galaxyMilky WayGalactic planeAstrophysicsMultifractal systemAnisotropyGeometryLongitudeSpectral densityGalaxyFractalOpticsLatitudeAstronomyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2D wavelet transform modulus maxima method is used to obtain quantitative information on the fractal/multifractal nature and anisotropic structure of Galactic atomic hydrogen (H I) from the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey. Five mosaics were analyzed in the second quadrant of the Milky Way, corresponding to the Local, Perseus, and Outer spiral arms, as well as two "interarm" regions located between these three spiral arms. A monofractal signature is found for all five mosaics. An anisotropic signature is detected: the rms roughness fluctuations of the mosaics in the latitude direction differ from those in the longitude direction. This anisotropy is scale-independent for the interarm regions while it is scale-dependent for the spiral arms. The longitudinal matter distribution of H I structure is similar for all five mosaics while the latitudinal distribution is smoother in the spiral arms. These results hold for all physical length scales studied, from ~2 pc in the Local arm to ~44 pc in the Outer arm. Several hypotheses are investigated to provide a physical explanation: the scale-height gradient, the density wave, star formation activity, photolevitation of dusty clouds, random motion of H I clouds, corrugation, and turbulence. The slopes of the power spectra for an increasing number of velocity channels were compared for 11 sections of the Local arm column density mosaic. All slopes are identical within the uncertainties (-3.0) and we do not detect for the Galactic plane the change in the power law index predicted by Lazarian and Pogosyan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207