Pre‐LNA smart soft antenna selection for MIMO spatial multiplexing/diversity system when amplifier/sky noise dominates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Due to a beamforming capability, Soft Antenna Selection (SAS) techniques have shown great performance improvements over the traditional antenna sub‐set selection schemes for Multi‐Input and Multi‐Output (MIMO) communication systems. A SAS method is basically defined by a pre‐processing matrix which is located in RF domain, either before or after the Low Noise Amplifier (LNA). In this paper, we propose a pre‐LNA SAS module which is adaptively tuned to maximise the mutual information or the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) gain for spatial multiplexing or diversity transmissions, respectively. The SAS optimality is discussed for the two practical cases where either the sky noise or the amplifier noise dominates. We analytically show that the pre‐LNA SAS method even outperforms the full‐complexity MIMO system for when the number of receive Radio Frequency (RF) chains is greater than or equal to the number of the transmit RF chains. The simulation results verify this claim and also superiority of the proposed scheme to the post‐LNA SAS. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it