MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effect of Fluid Ingestion During Soccer Training on Fluid Balance and Aerobic Test Performance

2008· article· en· W2090826396 on OpenAlexaff
Natalie R. Downey, Kate Buddo, Matthew S. Palmer, Lawrence L. Spriet

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWEATUrine specific gravityCrossover studyAerobic exerciseFluid replacementPhysical therapyAnimal scienceIngestionFluid intakeMedicinePlaceboUrineAnesthesiaInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous research in warm and cool environments demonstrated that soccer players do not voluntarily replace the sweat losses incurred during training sessions. Sweat losses of ~2% body mass have been shown to impair the performance of soccer-specific skills. PURPOSE: To examine the pre-training hydration status, sweat and sodium losses of female varsity soccer players (n=12, 18 - 20 years, 60.9 ± 1.7 kg, 1.79 ± 0.02 m), and evaluate their aerobic performance following three, 90 min training sessions. METHODS: The study employed a randomized, crossover design and all players completed, 1) no fluid (NF), 2) sweetened water (W), and 3) carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES) trials. Players drank 1 litre of the assigned fluid (blinded) during training in the W and CES trials in doses of 250 ml at -30 min and 0 before practice, and 30 and 60 min during practice. Pre-practice hydration status was estimated by measuring urine specific gravity (USG). Sweat rates were calculated from body mass changes and fluid intake. Sweat sodium concentration ([Na]) was analyzed in forehead sweat patch samples and used with sweat rate to estimate sodium loss. Aerobic performance was measured with a repeated, 20 m running test to fatigue (beep test) following all practices. RESULTS: Pre-practice USG was not different between NF (1.016 ± 0.003), W (1.021 ± 0.002), and CES (1.015 ± 0.003). Body mass loss was greatest in NF (2.4 ± 0.2%) compared to W and CES (0.3 ± 0.2, 0.1 ± 0.2%). Sweat rate during practice was significantly higher in NF (0.95 ± 0.09 l·hr-1) than in W and CES (0.69 ± 0.09, 0.65 ± 0.07 l·hr-1). Sweat [Na] was not different between NF (61.5 ± 3.6 mM), W (53.5 ± 3.1 mM), and CES (56.9 ± 5.2 mM), but net sodium loss was greater in NF (2040 ± 246 mg) than in W and CES (1271 ± 171, 867 ± 263 mg). Subjects were successfully blinded from the drinks and aerobic performance (beep test) was prolonged over NF by 7 levels in W, and further prolonged by 4 levels in CES. CONCLUSIONS: Female varsity soccer players incurred large sweat and sodium loses during a 90 min practice. Consuming 1 litre of fluid throughout practice prevented body mass losses and prolonged fatigue during an aerobic performance test. Consuming a CES was able to improve performance appreciably over water alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicSports Performance and Training→French-language works237,207→