MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090853155 · doi:10.1109/icemt.2010.5657550

Framework for long-life Education: Professional learning communities

2010· article· en· W2090853155 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie Josée Berger, Renée Forgette-Giroux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEducational Assessment and Improvement
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStudent achievementQualitative researchProfessional learning communityProfessional developmentAcademic achievementCapacity buildingMathematics educationPsychologyMedical educationPedagogySociologyPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Province of Ontario, Canada, is demonstrating its deep commitment to the goal of equitable student outcomes through the development of the Framework of long-life Education and its support for implementation in schools. As shown in this research, it has built capacity among teachers, acted as a catalyst for collaborative conversations about school improvement, and focused attention on the importance of improving the achievement levels of all students. The findings from this qualitative study on the pilot implementation of the Framework show that it was instrumental in initiating capacity building among teachers, which in some schools was linked to improvement in student achievement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Assessment and ImprovementFrench-language works237,207