MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090876421 · doi:10.1117/12.379894

<title>Clinical trials of photodynamic therapy of malignant brain tumors</title>

2000· article· en· W2090876421 on OpenAlexaff
Paul J. Müller, Brian C. Wilson, Lothar Lilge, Victor X. D. Yang, Mike H. Hitchcock, Fred W. Hetzel, Qun Chen, T. Fullager, Robert A. Fenstermaker, Robert G. Selker, Judith Abrams

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodynamic therapyMedicineClinical trialGliomaOncologyInternal medicineSurgeryCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a local treatment for malignment tumors. In a phase 2 trial in patients with supratentorial gliomas treated with 2 mg/kg Photofrin i.v. and intraoperative cavitary PDT, we were able to conclude that PDT was safe in patients with either newly diagnosed or recurrent supratentorial malignant gliomas. There appears to be prolongation of survival in selected patients when an adequate light dose is used. The surgical mortality rate was less than 3 percent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207