Nickel Dithiolene Chelate Rings in a New Role as η<sup>5</sup>-Coordinating Ligands: Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Redox Reactivity of an “Fe<sub>2</sub>Ni” Bis-Double-Decker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bis-double-decker complex has been assembled from the nickel bisdithiolene complex [Ni(S 2C 2Me 2) 2] (1-/2-) and two [Cp*Fe] (+) units (Cp* = C 5Me 5). The complex, [(eta (5)-Cp*-Fe-mu-eta (5),eta (5)-((S 2C 2Me 2) 2Ni)Fe-eta (5)-Cp*] ( n ) ( 1 ( n )), was isolated in two charge states ( n = 0, 1). The structure of 1 (+) was confirmed by X-ray crystallography for 1 (+)PF 6 (-) and 1 (+)BF 4 (-), and it shows the nickel bisdithiolene units pi-donating to iron centers. Both salts crystallize in a centrosymmetric space group (center of inversion at nickel). Computational (density functional theory) data indicate a highly delocalized spin density for 1 (+). The reaction of 1 with 1 or 2 equiv of HBF 4 leads to oxidation to form 1 (+) or 1 (2+), respectively. On an electrochemical time scale, reversibility is observed for the redox series 1/ 1 (+)/ 1 (2+), with an additional slower step for oxidation of 1 (2+).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".