The Osmotic Activation of Transporter ProP Is Tuned by Both Its C-terminal Coiled-coil and Osmotically Induced Changes in Phospholipid Composition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transporter ProP of Escherichia coli (ProPEc) senses extracellular osmolality and mediates osmoprotectant uptake when it is rising or high. A replica of the ProPEc C terminus (Asp468-Arg497) forms an intermolecular alpha-helical coiled-coil. This structure is implicated in the osmoregulation of intact ProPEc, in vivo. Like that from Corynebacterium glutamicum (ProPCg), the ProP orthologue from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (ProPAt) sensed and responded to extracellular osmolality after expression in E. coli. The osmotic activation profiles of all three orthologues depended on the osmolality of the bacterial growth medium, the osmolality required for activation rising as the growth osmolality approached 0.7 mol/kg. Thus, each could undergo osmotic adaptation. The proportion of cardiolipin in a polar lipid extract from E. coli increased with extracellular osmolality so that the osmolality activating ProPEc was a direct function of membrane cardiolipin content. Group A ProP orthologues (ProPEc, ProPAt) share the C-terminal coiled-coil domain and were activated at low osmolalities. Like variant ProPEc-R488I, in which the C-terminal coiled-coil is disrupted, ProPEc derivatives that lack the coiled-coil and Group B orthologue ProPCg required a higher osmolality to activate. The amplitude of ProPEc activation was reduced 10-fold in its deletion derivatives. The coiled-coil structure is not essential for osmotic activation of ProP per se. However, it tunes Group A orthologues to osmoregulate over a low osmolality range. Coiled-coil lesions may impair both coiled-coil formation and interaction of ProPEc with amplifier protein ProQ. Cardiolipin may contribute to ProP adaptation by altering bulk membrane properties or by acting as a ProP ligand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".