MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090910039 · doi:10.1017/s1355617701711113

Impaired skill learning in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure

2001· letter· en· W2090910039 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Laforce, SHARON HAYWARD, Lori Vitale Cox

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society · 2001
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySerial reaction timePrenatal alcohol exposureImplicit memoryPriming (agriculture)CognitionDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyPopulationProcedural memoryImplicit learningExplicit memoryTask (project management)AudiologySequence learningEpisodic memoryNeuroscienceAlcoholMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global and widespread cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions have been documented in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure (CHPAE). In addition to further exploring explicit-memory functioning in this population, recent investigations have creatively looked into implicit-memory functions by testing the ability of CHPAE to perform priming (Mattson & Riley, 1999) or skill-learning (Carmichael Olson et al., 1998; Sampson et al., 1997) tasks. These empirical efforts have been supported by recent studies which have linked prenatal alcohol exposure to disproportionate volumetric reductions in subcortical structures such as the basal ganglia (Mattson et al., 1994) and cerebellum (Cavanagh et al., 1997), two structures that have been shown to be actively involved in implicit memory (Doyon et al., 1997, 1998; Heindel et al., 1989; Rauch et al., 1997). In each case, a profile of preserved implicit and impaired explicit-memory functioning has emerged. In the skill-learning domain, for example, participants were required to complete four blocks of 100 trials of the serial reaction time (SRT) task in which participants have to press the button which corresponds to the light that is illuminated, and in which there is an embedded sequence of ten positions that is repeatedly presented throughout blocks of trials. On the latter task, both studies indicated that CHPAE children tended to have longer mean response times than controls, but that their learning profile did not differ across the four blocks of trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the International Neuropsychological SocietySame topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207