MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090917112 · doi:10.1071/rdv23n1ab252

252 EFFECT OF FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE ADDITION ON IN VITRO MATURATION AND CLEAVAGE OF ALPACA (VICUGNA PACOS) EMBRYOS

2010· article· en· W2090917112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. L. Condori, M. Chileno, J. Cainzo, Fanny Valverde, Pedro J. García Herradón

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vitro maturationAndrologyOocyteFollicle-stimulating hormoneChemistryBiologyEndocrinologyHormoneInternal medicineEmbryoLuteinizing hormoneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously reported that alpaca oocytes require between 38 and 42 h of maturation time (Huanca et al. 2010 Reprod. Fertil Dev. 22(1), 327). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of FSH in the maturation medium on nuclear maturation and cleavage rate. Ovaries were collected from a slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory in a thermos flask containing a saline solution 0.9% with antibiotic antimycotic at 35°C. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) were obtained by slicing of ovaries with a scalpel and were pooled in a conical tube for sedimentation before evaluation. The 476 COC with homogeneous cytoplasm and 2 or more layers of cumulus cells were transferred to plates with a 40-µmL drop of maturation medium TCM-199 supplemented with 10% FCS (vol:vol), 10 µg mL–1 of hCG, 0.2 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 µg mL–1 of gentamicine, and 1 µg mL–1 of oestradiol plus 0.5 µg mL–1 of FSH (Folltropin, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) according the following treatments: T1 (Control): FSH by 42 h, T2: 21 h with FSH + 21 h without FSH, T3: 21 h without FSH + 21 h with FSH. The COC were maintenance under mineral oil with 10 to 12 oocytes per drop and maturated 42 h at 39°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and high humidity. After the maturation time, part of the COC were removed from maturation medium and washed with PBS supplemented with 10% FCS and 1 mg/mL of hyaluronidase and fixed in ethanol: acetic acid (3:1). Oocytes were placed on the slide with minimum medium and stained with 1% orcein for 5 min. The slides were examined under a phase contrast microscope at ×400 to evaluate the status of nuclear maturation and classify as germinal vesicle (GV), metaphase I (MI), anaphase–telophase, metaphase II (MII), and degenerated. The other part of oocytes was fertilized in vitro using epididymal sperm. Motile spermatozoa were obtained by centrifugation at 600 × g on a percoll discontinuous gradient (22.5:45.0%) for 10 min. After the supernatant was removed by aspiration, the pellet was resuspended in TL HEPES and centrifuged again at 300 × g by 5 m. The pellet was resuspended in TL Stock. Gametes were coincubated for 18 h at 39°C with 5% CO2 and high humidity. Presumptive zygotes were culture in KSOM supplemented with 1 mM of glutamine, 0.3 mM of sodium pyruvate, 50 µg mL–1 of gentamicine, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, amino acids essentials and nonessentials, and BSA by 3 days and cultured in SOF medium for 7 days. Cleavage rate was evaluated at 72 h. Proportional data were compared by chi-square test. The proportions of oocytes reaching MII stage were 64.9 ± 8.1, 49.2 ± 9.4, and 53.8 ± 7.5% for T1, T2, and T3, respectively. Cleavage rates were 39.1, 36.3, and 33.1% and blastocysts rates were 13.6, 16.1, and 14.5% for T1, T2, and T3, respectively. The results suggest that the moment of addition of FSH does not have an effect on the maturation and cleavage rate of alpaca oocytes. This work was supported by Grant 064 – FINCyT – PIBAP 2008 and Grant 032 – PROCYT – CONCYTEC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207