A Continuous Method for Reducing Interpolation Artifacts in Mutual Information-Based Rigid Image Registration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose an approach for computing mutual information in rigid multimodality image registration. Images to be registered are modeled as functions defined on a continuous image domain. Analytic forms of the probability density functions for the images and the joint probability density function are first defined in 1D. We describe how the entropies of the images, the joint entropy, and mutual information can be computed accurately by a numerical method. We then extend the method to 2D and 3D. The mutual information function generated is smooth and does not seem to have the typical interpolation artifacts that are commonly observed in other standard models. The relationship between the proposed method and the partial volume (PV) model is described. In addition, we give a theoretical analysis to explain the nonsmoothness of the mutual information function computed by the PV model. Numerical experiments in 2D and 3D are presented to illustrate the smoothness of the mutual information function, which leads to robust and accurate numerical convergence results for solving the image registration problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it