MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090976838 · doi:10.1243/09544054jem453

Enhanced integrated manufacturing systems in an immersive virtual environment

2007· article· en· W2090976838 on OpenAlexafffund
Qingjin Peng, Chunsheng Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer-integrated manufacturingProcess development execution systemManufacturing engineeringManufacturing execution systemComputer scienceProcess (computing)Product (mathematics)Integrated Computer-Aided ManufacturingConcurrent engineeringSystem integrationProduction (economics)VisualizationProcess managementSystems engineeringEngineeringProcess integrationProcess engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Product innovation requires a dynamic manufacturing system to meet customers' demand with reduced cost. A time lag may exist in manufacturing systems between identifying a problem and finding solutions for the problem. There is a lack of decision tools for unseen problems in the manufacturing process and it is not well-integrated for product review and production evaluation in the current integrated manufacturing systems. An immersive virtual environment (VE) is employed in this research to enhance integrated manufacturing systems by the integration of product review and production evaluation, and by the integration of the system and users. The interaction between a manufacturing system and users is manipulated in a VE. The VE-based integration of manufacturing systems emphasizes the visualization and users' involvement, which enables a rapid and efficient process of the product development. The VE provides a means of efficient decision making over the entire process of product design and manufacturing and there is a complete integration of the system and users. Concurrent planning, sharing information, and users' involvement are three major features of the system, which is outlined in the current paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering ManufactureSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207