MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090986349 · doi:10.1109/dcc.2007.2

A Distortion Optimal Rate Allocation Algorithm for Transmission of Embedded Bitstreams over Noisy Channels

2007· article· en· W2090986349 on OpenAlexaff
Amir H. Banihashemi, Ahmad Hatam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrellis (graph)Viterbi algorithmNetwork packetAlgorithmSpace–time trellis codeDistortion (music)Computer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Dynamic programmingViterbi decoderQuadratic equationConvolutional codeMathematicsMathematical optimizationDecoding methodsTelecommunicationsComputer networkBlock codeBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a globally distortion optimal solution is proposed for FPP. The method, which is applicable to any source with arbitrary distortion-rate characteristics, has quadratic complexity in N, where N is the number of transmitted packets. It is based on constructing a search trellis in which trellis levels represent the number of packets, trellis states at a given level i embody the possible source rates corresponding to i packets, and edges represent different code rates. Such a trellis, starts from a single root state and spreads out in N levels. We prove that the backward application of a Viterbi-like algorithm to this trellis starting from the final states and working towards the root results in a survivor path that provides us with the distortion optimal rate allocation solution. The proposed method can also be applied to VPP, providing an alternative to the algorithm of V. Chande and N. Farvardin (2000) with comparable complexity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207