MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091003410 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.080396

Back Pain in a Patient withWegener’s Granulomatosis

2008· letter· en· W2091003410 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
S. Kerkeni, Thomas Bardin, P. Richette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2008
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAssistance publique-Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMedicinemyalgiaGranulomatous inflammationVasculitisDermatologyBack painArthritisSystemic diseasePathologySurgeryImmunopathologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We were most interested to read Prof. Pritzker's assessment of the state of research into the crystal induced arthropathies 1 .We wish to assure Prof. Pritzker and the wider rheumatology community that, rather than being a "dwindling endangered species whose interests are seen to be peripheral to those of most rheumatologists," those researchers involved in studying the crystal induced arthropathies are enthusiastic, energetic, and productive.In recent years, work in this field has led to critical advances in our understanding of the basic science and epidemiology of crystal induced arthropathies [2][3][4][5][6] .Further, the prospect of new agents to treat these diseases is cause for great enthusiasm.For management of acute crystal induced arthropathies, components of the inflammasome, and particularly interleukin 1, provide new therapeutic targets.The development of novel uratelowering therapies, such as febuxostat and PEG-uricase for treatment of chronic gout, should also have a major impact on longterm management of this prevalent disease, in preventing acute gout attacks and the consequences of chronic gout such as disfiguring tophi, joint damage, and disability 7,8 .As a reflection of the interest in gout within the rheumatology community, gout sessions have been included in the scientific programs of the 2 last EULAR annual meetings, the 2 last ACR annual meetings, and as Special Interest Groups (SIG) or Workshops in the last 3 OMERACT meetings.EULAR has recently supported a Task Force on Gout, resulting in the publication of Evidence Based Recommendations for Diagnosis and Management 9,10 , and the ACR and EULAR have funded an international project for validation of acute gout flares.The number of presentations at ACR and EULAR meetings is 10 times that of a decade ago, and the number of original papers on gout in high impact international journals now exceeds that of reviews, a situation inverse to that observed a decade ago.In addition, as the reader may observe, the group of investigators devoted to gout does not have the appearance of an endangered species (Figure 1).It is for these reasons that we do not share Prof. Pritzker's pessimistic view regarding the state of research into the crystal induced arthropathies.The number of investigators may be small, but recent progress has been significant and is likely to translate into important new treatments for patients with these diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0160.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207