MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Novos desafios dos jovens na atualidade: trabalho, educação e família

2008· article· pt· W2091012340 on OpenAlex
Tânia Regina Raitz, Luciane Carmem Figueredo Petters

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologia & Sociedade · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth, Politics, and Society
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)SociologyHumanitiesArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os dilemas da juventude na atualidade se apresentam não somente de forma inédita e desafiante, mas se constituem como um complexo e grave problema de crise do trabalho juvenil no Brasil. Este estudo foi realizado com jovens do Ensino Médio em um município litorâneo do interior de Santa Catarina. As estratégias utilizadas pelos jovens na relação "trabalho, educação e família", numa nova ética do trabalho na sociedade contemporânea, se constituiu na problemática central. A pesquisa realizada foi de natureza quantitativa e qualitativa, através da aplicação de questionários e entrevistas (grupo focal) com o objetivo de identificar a situação de educação e de trabalho desses jovens. Os resultados indicam a necessidade de políticas públicas para a juventude que sinalizem a emergência de se repensar propostas de educação e trabalho que atendam as condições juvenis, em conseqüência da incerteza que hoje rodeia o mercado de trabalho.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it