MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091020972 · doi:10.1134/s1070363212050064

Lignin-type, α,β-unsaturated aldehydes of lignin-type in organic solvents

2012· article· en· W2091020972 on OpenAlexaff
Д. В. Моисеев, Brian R. James, А. В. Гущин

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of General Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryLigninPhosphineDiastereomerAcetoneHemiacetalOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryZwitterionCinnamaldehydeDerivative (finance)CatalysisMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 1:1 reaction of [HO(CH 2 ) 3 ] 3 P with 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-cinnamaldehyde (coniferaldehyde) or 3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamaldehyde (sinapaldehyde) in acetone at room temperature affords phosphonium zwitterions of the type R 3 P + CH(4-O − -Ar)CH 2 CHO; other phosphines [R = Et, n -Bu, (CH 2 ) 2 CN, and p -Tol] do not react under the same conditions. In alcohols R’OH(D) [R’ = CD 3 , Et, (CD 3 ) 2 CD, s -Bu, HOCH 2 CH 2 ], the above phosphines (except the cyano-derivative) and those where R = i -Pr, Cy, Me 2 Ph, MePh 2 do react within an equilibrium established between the reactants and the zwitterion-hemiacetal products R 3 P + CH(4-O − -Ar)CH 2 CH(OH)(OR′) that are formed as a mixture of two diastereomers. The nature of the phosphine and the alcohol affects the equilibrium and the diastereomeric ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of General ChemistrySame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207