HSG cells differentiated by culture on extracellular matrix involves induction of S‐adenosylmethione decarboxylase and ornithine decarboxylase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human salivary gland (HSG) epithelial cell line can differentiate when cultured on extracellular matrix preparations. We previously identified >30 genes upregulated by adhesion of HSG cells to extracellular matrix. In the current studies, we examined the role of one of these genes, the polyamine pathway biosynthetic enzyme S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (SAM-DC) and the related enzyme, ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), on HSG cell differentiation during culture on extracellular matrix. HSG cells cultured on fibronectin-, collagen I gel-, and Matrigel-coated substrates for 12-24 h upregulated SAM-DC and ODC mRNA expression and enzyme activity compared to cells cultured on non-precoated substrates. After 3-5 days, HSG cells grown on Matrigel- or collagen I gel-coated substrates acquired a differentiated phenotype: the cells showed changes in culture morphology and increased expression of salivary gland differentiation markers (vimentin, SN-cystatin, and alpha-amylase). Further, culturing the cells on substrates precoated with an anti-beta1-integrin-antibody promoted differentiation-like changes. HSG cells cultured on collagen I- or Matrigel-coated substrates rapidly entered the cell cycle but showed decreased cell proliferation at longer times. In contrast, cell proliferation was enhanced on fibronectin-coated substrates compared to cells on non-precoated substrates. Treatment with the polyamine synthesis inhibitors, difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), and methylglyoxal bis-(guanylhydrazone) (MGBG), inhibited cell proliferation and delayed (3)H-thymidine incorporation in HSG cells cultured on all of the substrates. Further, inclusion of DFMO and MGBG inhibited or delayed acquisition of the differentiated phenotype in HSG cells cultured on Matrigel- or collagen I gel-coated substrates. This suggests that the adhesion-dependent expression of SAM-DC and ODC contributes to extracellular matrix-dependent HSG cell differentiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".