De I'URSS à la Russie : les institutions internationales de sécurité au service d'une superpuissance en chute libre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Constatant que sa puissance diminuait à vue d'oeil, la Russie, tout comme VURSS à la veille de sa dissolution, a recouru aux us afin de préserver ses prérogatives d'une grande puissance menacées par les grands bouleversements géopolitiques. L'article montre à travers trois études de cas combien VURSS durant la crise du Golfe s'efforça à grand-peine de sauvegarder ses intérêts sérieusement entamés ; expérience que la Russie connaîtra avec l'élargissement de I'OTAN vers les pays de l'Europe centrale et orientale. Seule au Conseil de sécurité la puissance grandement amoindrie de la Russie paraît être à l'abri. L'article conclut que la Russie est placée constamment dans des contraintes institutionnelles qui lui échappent malgré ses tentatives d'employer les us existantes pour arrêter l'hémorragie de son influence historique mondiale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".