MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091121479 · doi:10.1109/ofc.2005.192924

Third-order cascaded Raman amplification benefits for 10 Gbits/s WDM unrepeated transmission systems

2005· article· en· W2091121479 on OpenAlexaff
S. Faralli, S. Sugliani, G. Sacchi, Fabrizio Di Pasquale, S.B. Papernyi

Bibliographic record

VenueOFC/NFOEC Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMPB Technologies & Communications (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavelength-division multiplexingTransmission (telecommunications)Raman scatteringRaman spectroscopyRaman amplificationRayleigh scatteringOpticsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsTelecommunicationsWavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benefits provided by third-order Raman pumping in unrepeated WDM transmission systems are quantified in terms of BER performances at 10 Gb/s. Double-Rayleigh scattering noise induces transmission penalties at very high on-off Raman gain and must be kept under control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOFC/NFOEC Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2005.Same topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207