MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ability of three yellow pigment producing fungi to colour wood under controlled conditions

2014· article· en· W2091143136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Wood Products Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncubationPigmentIncubation periodBiologyBotanyChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inonotus hispidus, Scytalidium ganodermophthorum and two strains of Scytalidium lignicola were tested for their ability to produce yellow extracellular pigment on media plates, sterile wood blocks and non-sterile logs to determine their suitability for use as spalting fungi. All three fungi produced a penetrating yellow pigment in the non-sterile logs after 12 weeks of incubation; however, results from the sterile block tests indicated that the incubation time necessary for I. hispidus to produce sufficient yellow pigment may be as low as 4 weeks of incubation. An incubation period of 4 weeks is the shortest recorded for controlled spalting and will allow for the currently utilised production time for yellow spalted wood of 12 weeks to be substantially decreased using an isolate of I. hispidus as the inoculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it