Digital filtering using the multidimensional logarithmic number system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce the use of multidimensional logarithmic number system (MDLNS) as a generalization of the classical 1-D logarithmic number system (LNS) and analyze its use in DSP applications. The major drawback of the LNS is the requirement to use very large ROM arrays in implementing the additions and subtraction and it limits its use to low-precision applications. MDLNS allows exponential reduction of the size of the ROMs used without affecting the speed of the computational process; moreover, the calculations over different bases and digits are completely independent, which makes this particular representation perfectly suitable for massively parallel DSP architectures. The use of more than one base has at least two extra advantages. Firstly, the proposed architecture allows us to obtain the final result straightforwardly in binary form, thus, there is no need of the exponential amplifier, used in the known LNS architectures. Secondly, the second base can be optimized in accordance to the specific digital filter characteristics. This leads to dramatic reduction of the exponents used and, consequently, to large area savings. We offer many examples showing the computational advantages of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it