Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le prochain sommet de l’Alliance, qui doit se tenir à Prague en novembre 2002, doit traiter de deux questions essentielles pour l’avenir de l’OTAN : son élargissement et la réduction des inégalités, au sein de l’Alliance, entre les capacités militaires des États-Unis et celles de leurs alliés. Mais, au-delà de l’adhésion de nouveaux membres, la question de la détermination des frontières de l’OTAN est intimement liée à l’évolution du statut de l’Alliance. Longtemps vouée à la défense collective de l’Europe occidentale face à la menace soviétique, l’OTAN – organisation régionale à vocation militaire – est-elle devenue une organisation à caractère politique, dont la mission principale est d’être un vecteur de l’extension de la démocratie, et dont le champ d’opération recouvre la planète entière ? La réponse dépendra de l’intérêt que les États-Unis voudront accorder à l’Alliance et à la consolidation du projet européen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".