Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le prochain sommet de l’Alliance, qui doit se tenir à Prague en novembre 2002, doit traiter de deux questions essentielles pour l’avenir de l’OTAN : son élargissement et la réduction des inégalités, au sein de l’Alliance, entre les capacités militaires des États-Unis et celles de leurs alliés. Mais, au-delà de l’adhésion de nouveaux membres, la question de la détermination des frontières de l’OTAN est intimement liée à l’évolution du statut de l’Alliance. Longtemps vouée à la défense collective de l’Europe occidentale face à la menace soviétique, l’OTAN – organisation régionale à vocation militaire – est-elle devenue une organisation à caractère politique, dont la mission principale est d’être un vecteur de l’extension de la démocratie, et dont le champ d’opération recouvre la planète entière ? La réponse dépendra de l’intérêt que les États-Unis voudront accorder à l’Alliance et à la consolidation du projet européen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".