MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Costilla cervical en el diagnóstico diferencial de una masa supraclavicular

2014· article· es· W2091163484 on OpenAlexaff
T. Ballesteros Lara, M. A. Martínez Montes, Alberto Sala

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatría Atención Primaria · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClavicleGynecologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cervical rib in the differential diagnosis of supraclavicular massLa costilla cervical consiste en una costilla supernumeraria que surge de la séptima vértebra cervical y termina libremente en el tejido del cuello o se articula con la primera costilla.Puede ser asintomática y diagnosticarse como hallazgo casual en una radiografía de tórax, o bien presentarse con dolor en la región supraclavicular o como complicación en forma de síndrome del desfiladero torácico.A menudo plantea diagnóstico diferencial con masas tumorales malignas, por sus características en la exploración.El manejo suele ser conservador y la intervención quirúrgica se reserva para casos muy sintomáticos o complicados.Presentamos un caso clínico de costilla cervical sintomática y su abordaje desde Atención Primaria.Cervical rib is a supernumerary rib arising from the seventh cervical vertebra and ends freely in the tissue of the neck or articulates with the first rib.It can be diagnosed as an asymptomatic incidental finding on a chest radiograph or presented with supraclavicular pain or complications as thoracic outlet syndrome.The differential diagnosis often poses malignant tumor masses, because of their characteristics in the physical exam.The management is often conservative reserving surgical intervention for highly symptomatic or complicated cases.We report a case of symptomatic cervical rib and its approach from Primary Care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatría Atención PrimariaSame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207