MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091165039 · doi:10.1109/dasc.2014.64

An Efficient ZigBee-WebSocket Based M2M Environmental Monitoring System

2014· article· en· W2091165039 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Shuang, Xuan Shan, Zhengguo Sheng, Chunsheng Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT-based Smart Home Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDefault gatewayWireless sensor networkComputer networkEmbedded systemWirelessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technologies to support the Machine-to-Machine (M2M) is becoming more important as the need to better understand our environments and make them smart increases. As a result it is predicted that intelligent devices and networks, such as wireless network, will not be isolated but connected and integrated composing computer networks. So far, to enable an End-to-end M2M service, WebSocket has attracted lots of attentions because of its unique full-duplex communications features. Besides, ZigBee technology has widely been deployed in short-range wireless communication systems with its low-power dissipation and high transmission speed. In this paper, we focus on the emerging M2M gateway development for home and industry applications. Specifically, by providing the detailed system architecture and user cases, we give a specific analysis on environmental monitoring implemented with WebSocket and ZigBee technology. The ZigBee sensor network is used to collect the temperature and humidity information. The foreground of the system shows the related data through B/S (Browser/Server) mode by utilizing WebSocket to push the information received by a web server to the client browser.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT-based Smart Home SystemsFrench-language works237,207