XPS characterization of the corrosion film formed on the electroless nickel deposit prepared using different stabilizers in NaCl solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to examine the corrosion films formed on electroless nickel (EN) deposits prepared in an EN solution containing two different types and concentrations of bath stabilizers in Ar‐purged and oxygenated neutral 5% NaCl solution. Two distinctive corrosion films were observed after long periods of immersion. An enrichment of elemental phosphorus compared to nickel was observed on the surface of the EN deposit produced with no stabilizer and with maleic acid (MA). By comparison, a high degree of surface oxidation was observed on the EN deposit prepared with thiourea. Trace impurities of sulfur in the EN deposit prepared with thiourea appear to result in enhanced corrosion and, in turn, lead to the build‐up of corrosion products on the EN surface. By contrast, a P‐enriched chemical passivation layer was formed on the EN deposits prepared either without any stabilizer or with MA present. Copyright © 2007 Crown in the right of Canada, and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".