MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091170754 · doi:10.1076/orbi.20.4.259.2617

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy: What's new?

2001· article· en· W2091170754 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrbit · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHair Growth and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General HospitalUniversité de MontréalRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOculopharyngeal muscular dystrophyMedicinePtosisMuscular dystrophyEyelidPerspective (graphical)Genetic syndromesPediatricsDermatologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors place autosomal dominant oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy in a historical perspective, look at the genealogy involved, and review the genetic studies. In addition to summarizing what happens at the histopathological level, they examine the clinical characteristics of this late-onset dystrophy. Based on this knowledge, they try to present their rationale for the surgical treatment of the eyelid ptosis, taking into account that this disease is progressive and that treatment should be planned for the lifetime of the patient. Three representative cases are illustrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it