Survival and breeding of yellow‐eyed penguins <i>(Megadyptes antipodes),</i> at two locations on Otago Peninsula, South Island, New Zealand, 1991–96
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Two breeding locations of the endangered yellow‐eyed penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) , were monitored for six seasons between 1991 and 1996 to assess breeding success, breeding frequency, and survival parameters. Breeding success was inversely related to the total number of nests, suggesting that an influx of inexperienced breeders decreases the average breeding success. The proportions of males not breeding at either location in a season ranged from 0 to 13%, and 0 and 23% for females. Between 75 and 92% of breeders were recorded breeding in two consecutive seasons, while between 0 and 6% of breeders skipped one season and 9% of females (but no males) skipped two consecutive seasons. Annual survival averaged 90% for both breeding locations for four seasons (males 93%, females 90%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".