MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091212653 · doi:10.1109/sose.2013.10

Reliable Consumption of Web Services in a Mobile-Cloud Ecosystem Using REST

2013· article· en· W2091212653 on OpenAlexaff
Richard K. Lomotey, Ralph Deters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingScalabilityMobile deviceDistributed computingThe InternetSoftware deploymentComputer networkDatabaseWorld Wide WebOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of the mobile landscape coupled with the ubiquitous nature of the Internet and the cloud is facilitating the deployment of enterprise and personalized mobile applications. In this research, we proposed a proxy-enabled unification framework that integrates heterogeneous devices with multiple SaaS and IaaS cloud layers in order to support personalized and group file sharing. However, our proposed mobile-cloud ecosystem calls for open research questions which must be answered such as i) how do we synchronize the data across the consumer devices and the multi-IaaS backend?, ii) how do we authenticate the system users?, and iii) how do we push updates in a low-latency fashion? This paper addresses the three questions by proposing the adoption of the REST Web Service as an efficient way to consume the data on the mobile devices. However, we have to deal with the "CAP Theorem" which states that we can only achieve at most two properties at a time out of the following three: data consistency, system/data availability, and partition tolerance. Since partition tolerance is a given in a distributed system, we opt for the availability option by allowing file storage on the consumer devices in both online and offline modes. Further, we propose data consistency within a session that enforces update propagation in a soft-real time. The architecture is evaluated based on latency and scalability using multi consumer devices and employed Drop box and Amazon S3 as the IaaS cloud providers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207