MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091216053

Spontaneous Complete Necrosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Possible Immune System Hypothesis

2014· article· en· W2091216053 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Radwan Kassir, Gabriele Barabino, Serban Bageacu, Michel Péoc’h, Michele Jouffre-Cottier, Jack Porcheron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Current Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypervascularityMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaInfiltration (HVAC)NecrosisPathologyImmune systemNodule (geology)CarcinomaHepatectomyResectionSurgeryInternal medicineImmunologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an extraordinarily unusual phenomenon. The mechanisms underlying this intriguing phenomenon remain unknown. We report a 72-year-old man with a liver mass. MR pictures demonstrate arterial hypervascularity with venous washout. We performed a fine-needle aspiration cytology of this nodule and it allowed us to find an HCC well differentiated. Postoperative histopathologic findings demonstrated a spontaneous complete necrosis of HCC. The necrotic tissue was filled with large debris from a neoplastic tissue, regardless of no viable tumor cells were seen among them. The patient is alive and well for 2 years after surgery. The underlying mechanism of this phenomenon is not clear. The histologic findings of our patient are including the tumor necrosis, the severe inflammatory infiltration with lymphocytes and the thick fibrous capsule. We speculate that some immune mechanism may be involved in regression of HCC. J Curr Surg. 2014;4(1):26-28 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcs 204 w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Current SurgerySame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207