MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091301633 · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/18/3/035039

Microchannel fabrication in silica glass by femtosecond laser pulses with different central wavelengths

2008· article· en· W2091301633 on OpenAlex
Quan Sun, A. Saliminia, F. Théberge, Réal Vallée, See Leang Chin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemtosecondMaterials scienceMicrochannelLaserFabricationOpticsSapphireOptoelectronicsWavelengthAmplifierNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A newly developed tunable visible femtosecond laser source was used to fabricate microchannels in silica glass. For comparison, femtosecond laser pulses from a Ti-sapphire laser at 800 nm as well as from a femtosecond optical parametric amplifier at 1.3 µm were also employed to fabricate microchannels. We found that it is much more efficient to drill micro-channels using the visible pulses because of their lower damage threshold. The quality of the cross section of the microchannel is also better with this visible femtosecond laser source because of the high beam quality of the visible pulses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it