MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091308044 · doi:10.1029/2006jb004309

Role of void space geometry in permeability evolution in crustal rocks at elevated pressure

2006· article· en· W2091308044 on OpenAlexafffund
Philip Benson, P. G. Meredith, Alexandre Schubnel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTortuosityPorosityPermeability (electromagnetism)GeologyAnisotropyMicrostructureMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringMineralogyPetrologyMechanicsComposite materialOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A key consequence of the presence of void space within rock is their significant influence upon fluid transport properties. In this study, we measure changes in elastic wave velocities (P and S) contemporaneously with changes in permeability and porosity at elevated pressure for three rock types with widely different void space geometries: a high‐porosity sandstone (Bentheim), a tight sandstone (Crab Orchard), and a microcracked granodiorite (Takidani). Laboratory data are then used with the permeability models of Guéguen and Dienes and Kozeny‐Carman to investigate the characteristics that different void space geometries impart to measured permeabilities. Using the Kachanov effective medium theory, elastic wave velocities are inverted, permitting the recovery of crack density evolution with increasing effective pressure. The crack densities are then used as input to the microcrack permeability model of Guéguen and Dienes. The classic Kozeny‐Carman approach of Walsh and Brace is also applied to the measured permeability data via a least squares fit in order to extract tortuosity data. We successfully predict the evolution of permeability with increasing effective pressure, as directly measured in experiments, and report the contrast between permeability changes observed in rock where microcracks or equant pores dominate the microstructure. Additionally, we show how these properties are affected by anisotropy of the rock types via the measured anisotropic fabrics in each rock. The combined experimental and modeling results illustrate the importance of understanding the details of how rock microstructure changes in response to an external stimulus in predicting the simultaneous evolution of different rock physical properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207