Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: We read with interest the article by Lombroso (1), who reported on the case of a 6-year-old boy with pavor nocturnus of proven epileptic origin. The important message of this article is that similarities in the clinical presentation of sleep terrors and certain partial seizures can lead to difficulties in their classification and to false treatment. However, the patient described by Lombroso suffered from epileptic seizures of frontal lobe origin. The table of differential features between sleep terrors and so-called “epileptic sleep terrors” presented in the same article is derived from this case. We would like to stress that not all epileptic nocturnal episodes with fear can be distinguished from sleep terrors by features like preserved responsiveness, occurrence in clusters, or absence of hallucinations and amnesia. We have recently seen a 7-year-old boy suffering from recurrent attacks of intense fear, which initially occurred only at night, usually only once and mostly in early morning hours, but later occasionally also during day-time. The attacks started with a fearful scream for help, followed by disorientation and impaired responsiveness. Afterwards, he regularly reported that he had seen snakes and crocodiles on the floor, but was amnesic for the rest of the attack. Among other differential diagnoses, like pavor nocturnus and nightmares, an adjustment disorder was suspected due to misleading psychosocial circumstances (divorce of the parents). The child received psychotherapy for more than 2 years without any effect on the attacks. Only when two typical attacks with left temporal ictal activity were recorded by long-term video-EEG was focal epilepsy diagnosed. A subsequent MRI revealed abnormalities suggesting diffuse cortical dysplasia of the left anteromedial temporal lobe extending to the amygdala. The semiology of the attacks and the EEG results were regarded as congruent with an epileptic seizure onset in this region. The patient was treated successfully using antiepileptic drugs. Thus, clinical features accompanying epileptic sleep terrors mostly depend on the site of the epileptogenic zone. As our case demonstrates, disturbed responsiveness and complex visual hallucinations are not contradictory to epileptic sleep terrors, but can result from involvement of temporal lobe structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".