MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091353662 · doi:10.1118/1.1522749

Optimum momentum transfer arguments for x‐ray forward scatter imaging

2002· article· en· W2091353662 on OpenAlexaff
Robert J. LeClair, Paul C. Johns

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCarleton UniversityLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPhotonMomentum transferMomentum (technical analysis)Imaging phantomOpticsSquare rootKermaComputational physicsScatteringAtomic physicsDosimetryGeometryMathematicsNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our research program we have shown through modeling, related numerical calculations, and experimental measurements that there exists a potential use of scattered radiation for medical x-ray imaging. Each incident photon of wavelength lambda which scatters at a small angle theta with respect to its initial direction of travel has a change in momentum characterized by the photon momentum transfer argument x = lambda(-1) sin(theta/2). In this work, we show that in order to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) obtained with scattered x rays, one must detect photons with specific x values. Using a photon counting detector to distinguish 2-cm-thick polymethyl methacrylate and nylon targets situated within a 15-cm-diam spherical water phantom with an 80 kV beam yields experimentally SNR/square root(K(air)c) = 12.8 +/- 0.2 (mJ/kg)(-1/2) when using the photons between x = 0.5 and 0.7 nm(-1). Here K(air)c is the air collision kerma and the average momentum transfer argument, x, is calculated by weighting x by the incident photon fluence distribution. The model predicts a value of SNR/square root(K(air)c) = 12.9 (mJ/kg)(-1/2). If we choose to form the signal with the range in x extended to be from 0.5 to 1.0 nm(-1) then, despite the detection of more scattered photons, experimentally SNR/square root(K(air)c) decreases by 38% to 7.9 +/- 0.3 (mJ/kg)(-1/2). The model predicts a value of 9.46 (mJ/kg)(-1/2). Results for energy integrating detectors are in general similar to those for photon counters, but there exist cases where a significant decrease in SNR can occur. For example, for measurements in air with the two plastics at theta = 3 degrees the SNR for an energy integrator was found to be 52% that of a photon counter. Numerical calculations predict that the effects of spectral blur can be significant when a narrow angular range is used for detection. Preliminary numerical predictions for breast tissues suggest a potential use of x-ray scatter in the field of mammography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207