Simultaneous recording of brain responses indicating sensation and perception of changes in interaural phase differences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changing the interaural phase difference (IPD) between binaurally presented tones induces the sensation of a change of the sound source in space and elicits auditory brain responses specific for sound localization. We recorded neuromagnetic responses to IPD changes in young, middle-aged, and older listeners at various tonal frequencies. Young listeners showed brain responses below 1500 Hz according to the behavioral findings of using IPD for sound localization at low frequencies only. The upper limit for IPD detection decreased with age, and older listeners (mean age of 71 years) could make use of IPD changes only for tonal sounds below 750 Hz. The stimuli were amplitude modulated at 40 Hz and elicited synchronized brain activity at the rhythm of the amplitude modulation. Thus, 40-Hz brain activity was recorded simultaneously with the IPD change responses. Although the amplitude modulation as continuous and specifically did not change the interaural phase relation, the 40-Hz brain response was reset at the IPD change. We interpret the 40-Hz brain responses as related to sensory binding for perception. Each change in the auditory environment requires a reset and reconfiguration of the binding network, which can be observed in the reset of 40-Hz brain oscillations. Recording simultaneously brain responses to sensation and perception of IPD changes gives insight into the temporal dynamics of binaural auditory processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".